The NAAC expects the institutions to undertake AAA to monitor and evaluate the institutional process through systematic internal and external reviews. In order to introduce academic reforms, review their progress and support reforms in the respective Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), it was necessary to implement Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA).
The Academic and Administrative Audit is a peer review process including a self-study and a site visit by peers from inside and outside the institution. The purpose of an academic audit is to encourage programs, departments and the institution to evaluate their quality processes and standards based on predetermined benchmarks and to suggest activities required to produce, assure, and regularly improve the quality of the whole system in place including curricular and co-curricular programmes and activities and the infrastructure and support services.
The advantages of an academic audit are manifold such as, but not limited:
For students: It helps in eliminating unnecessary workload and dwells mainly on those essentially required for the success of a student’s career.
For teachers: It helps in clarifying their roles and responsibilities and thus avoids conflicts.
For employers: It ensures availability of well-rounded students who can contribute from day one itself.
For the Administrators: It gives an insight into the overall quality of the institution including its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
For Management: It ensures the proper use and effectiveness of the processes, systems, infrastructure, practices, infrastructure, HR and facilities in the practice of the institution and to implement corrective measures.
Based on the NAAC criteria, the AAA team draws attention to the following points:
Focus on teaching-learning and evaluation process:- how teachers teach (both conventional and innovative), how students learn (both formal and informal), and how best the students are assessed (both for life and career).
Define quality in terms of learning outcomes:- PO, PSO and CO mapping; and aligned with learning objectives.
Develop research culture:- a quest for new knowledge generation.
Teamwork:- collective responsibility, accountability and sharing.
Evidence-based Documentation:- of all programmes, activities and achievements.
Continuity and consistency:- based on the vision and mission of the institution.
Application of best practice:- best suited to the institution and the department.
Community orientation and Public perception:- campus community interaction and connectivity.
Alumni and placement:- both are brand ambassadors of an institution.
Continuous improvement:- continually and consciously strive to improve for the total quality development of the students, teachers and the institution.
Good Governance:- clearly defined hierarchy, administrative procedures and practices, systems, HR and other policies, transparent financial management, complaint resolution mechanism, etc.
Public Perception:- the accomplishment of the needs of the various stakeholders such as students, parents, teachers, staff, statutory authorities, society and the community.
Generally, there are two types of AAA – Internal AAA and External AAA.
NAAC has prescribed a specific methodology and guidelines for conducting Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) in the institutions. With the approval of the authorities, the IQAC of the respective institution can evolve strategies and procedures for conducting the audit, on the basis of their requirements and in line with the seven criteria fixed by the NAAC.
Internal Audit shall be done by IQAC of the institutions.
Every Institution is expected to conduct internal AAA at regular intervals to review the programmes and activities at the department level and the institution as a whole.
The Internal Audit process might take 3-5 days to complete.
The Internal Audit team usually consists of 3-5 senior teachers of the institution along with the Vice Principal and the IQAC coordinator.
The external audit is to be done in the institution by external peers/ experts.
External Audit team consist of a chairman & 2-3 peers, preferably NAAC Peer Team members or those from institutions belonging to the A+ category of NAAC evaluation. Auditors are primarily teachers who have experience and/or training on academic quality systems, processes and strategies and audit tactics and methodologies.
The External Audit needs 2-3 days to complete.
The External Audit team, in the beginning, will meet and interact with the Principal and the IQAC team to collect the details of the programmes and activities being conducted/ undertaken during the period of audit.
Auditors will then visit all departments and facilities and generally verify the Self Study Report along with supporting documents. They will interact with the HoD and the teacher in charge of quality assurance and will seek for doubts and clarifications if any.
After conducting the audit in all the departments and facilities, the audit team will sit with the IQAC team to obtain further details, documents and clarifications.
Before the exit meeting, the external audit team will again interact with the Manager, Principal and the IQAC coordinator and present the brief observations and findings of the audit. Both parties (the Principal, the IQAC Coordinator and the Audit Team) can express their views and analysis on the observations and findings of the audit.
Finally, the External Audit team meets the teachers and staff and the Chairman of the Audit team will present a brief summary of the observations and findings of the audit.
Stages of the academic and administrative audit process involve the following stages:
Each department shall prepare a self-study report, based on the latest seven NAAC criteria, of their respective departments. It shall include all the programmes and activities of the department with supporting documents/ evidence. Give emphasis to the following points:
Once the yearly/ periodic Self-study Report with evidence-based documentation is ready, the internal audit team will review it by going to each department, administrative units and facilities. On the basis of their observations, the internal audit team will prepare a report and submit it to the Principal. The Principal after careful check and review will pass it on to the IQAC for implementation of the suggestions and recommendations.
The IQAC team will carefully study the suggestions and recommendations of the internal audit team and implement and modify the Self Study Report.
Once the Self Study Report is modified, the external audit team will be invited to conduct the external Academic and Administrative Audits (AAA). They will prepare a schedule for the AA (model given at Annexure) and will conduct the AAA accordingly in all the departments, administrative units and facilities. On the basis of their visit and observations and discussions with the IQAC Coordinator and the Principal, the external audit team will give a report to the Principal usually in an exit meeting.
The Principal after careful check and review will forward the report of the External Audit team to the IQAC for implementation of the suggestions and recommendations. A detailed plan of action may be prepared to implement the suggestions in a phased and organised manner.
By establishing the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) and undergoing Academic and Administrative Audits (AAA) process regularly, it is possible for all Institutions of Higher Education HEIs) to continuously strive for excellence.
The assessment, monitoring and evaluation of the institutional processes require a carefully structured system, course of action and procedure of internal and external audit and reviews. The NAAC expects the Institutions to undertake continuous internal and external Academic and Administrative Audits (AAA) on a regular basis. If implemented properly and systematically it will help all Institutions of Higher Education (HEIs) to impart quality culture and perform better in all aspects of academic functioning and performance for the benefit of all its stakeholders.
“Assessment is like an engine that drives students learning”. In this context, it is important that the engine should be flawless and perfectly tuned to a certain level of standards. A simple anecdote to depict the significance of the consolidation and tuning of the assessment tool is narrated here. “Once three persons were assigned a […]
National Education Policy 2020 (NEP) has marked an epoch development in the educational landscape of India. The policy envisions an India centred education system compatible to transform India to a vibrant knowledge society. Remarkably, the thrust area of the new education policy is to make the system of education well-resourced and multidisciplinary by the consolidation […]
Assessment and Evaluation are the processes which are integrated into the teaching at both interactive and post-active phases. An Achievement Test is one of the most commonly used summative assessment tools. Question Bank is a Best Practice for the generation of a good Achievement Test.
To learn something well, students should be able to hear it, see it, do it, ask questions about it and to discuss it with others.
A collection of Online resources to assist Distance Learning, during the COVID 19 lockdown.
Some of the Frequently Asked Questions about Outcome Based Education, answered by experts in our mentor panel.
A quick glimpse into government policies in the Indian higher education scenario after the Independence and the major changes that include autonomy and outcome based learning that evolved from these to create standards of excellence.
IPSR AcademiX Whitepaper on OBE: Designing and Implementing Outcome Based Education (OBE) for Indian HEIs
A Video Primer on the Cognitive domain of Bloom's Taxonomy, by Dr. Sunil Job. Gain a basic understanding of Bloom's scientific classification of knowledge levels.
Copyright @ 2021 ipsr solutions ltd. All rights reserved