Following are some of the Frequently Asked Questions about Outcome Based Education, answered by experts in our mentor panel.
What is the Psychological significance of OBE?
One of the basic principles of OBE is to provide expanded opportunities to the learner. This is based on the psychological perspective that anyone can learn, provided that the activities provided suits the learner’s level of capabilities. Positively, OBE caters to the individual difference of the learner. Moreover, in an OBE-approach, a student is not a passive recipient but an active and focused participant in the process of constructing knowledge and skills in the lines of the outcome. Frequent feedback about their performance will be a motivating factor which boosts up their future learning endeavour. Hence, OBE is a clear system which is rooted in a learner-centred approach with a sound psychological backup.
How many COs are needed for a course?
Well, there is no definite number. The Course Outcomes are the end product of a course. So the number of COs should depend on the nature of the course.
It may not be a good idea to fix the number of COs to a constant number as the nature and scope of each course vary. But it may be a better practice to keep the number to an optimal range like 5 to 6, based on the generic nature of courses within a programme.
Is it mandatory that Blooms Taxonomy should be used for defining outcomes?
Implementation of OBE in India has its root from WA (Washington Accord). As per the agreement, all the nations have decided to adopt OBE with Bloom’s taxonomy as the standard for scaling the levels of learning. Regarding the methodology in the formulation of an outcome, we need an action verb to make the outcome observable. If this action verb is in a standardized format (as per Bloom’s Taxonomy) it will be easy for anyone to understand the cognitive challenge expected from the part of the learner. Obviously, it will be cool to estimate the strength of mapping; an outcome has with the Outcomes of higher-order in the (OBE architecture). Moreover, Blooms Taxonomy is a widely accepted classification worldwide, with appropriate variability to identify the level of learning from the basic level of rote memorization to the highest order of creativity.
How to evaluate CO for activities? Does it become subjective?
For the Assessment of CO of activities like Assignments, Projects, Industrial visits etc, we have to prepare Rubrics for evaluation. Rubrics are just criteria for valuation where we grade the students as per the stated criteria. In order to eliminate subjectivity in the evaluation process, it is a good practice to state the quality statements for each criterion in advance. For the assessment of the COs, we have to point each criterion to the corresponding outcomes with the strength of mapping. Obviously, when we proceed with the evaluation of the work automatically the assessment of COs could be estimated with respect to the attainment of the students with respect to each criterion.
Will it be a tough task from the part of teachers to assess every student individually? How could it be managed along with normal teaching?
In the present context of our educational system, OBE based assessments are done along with the normal assessment practices. Obviously, it will demand some additional effort from the part of the teachers. But in the current technology-enabled system, we could integrate a lot of smart practices to lessen the effort and make the process more reliable and valid.
Positively, integration of the possibilities of innovation and technology could make the OBE related activities systematic and manageable.
If you wish any specific questions to be answered under this FAQ, please let us know. We shall put them across to our experts and update the FAQ.
“Assessment is like an engine that drives students learning”. In this context, it is important that the engine should be flawless and perfectly tuned to a certain level of standards. A simple anecdote to depict the significance of the consolidation and tuning of the assessment tool is narrated here. “Once three persons were assigned a […]
National Education Policy 2020 (NEP) has marked an epoch development in the educational landscape of India. The policy envisions an India centred education system compatible to transform India to a vibrant knowledge society. Remarkably, the thrust area of the new education policy is to make the system of education well-resourced and multidisciplinary by the consolidation […]
The NAAC expects the institutions to undertake AAA to monitor and evaluate the institutional process through systematic internal and external reviews. In order to introduce academic reforms, review their progress and support reforms in the respective Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), it was necessary to implement Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA). The Academic and Administrative Audit […]
Assessment and Evaluation are the processes which are integrated into the teaching at both interactive and post-active phases. An Achievement Test is one of the most commonly used summative assessment tools. Question Bank is a Best Practice for the generation of a good Achievement Test.
To learn something well, students should be able to hear it, see it, do it, ask questions about it and to discuss it with others.
A collection of Online resources to assist Distance Learning, during the COVID 19 lockdown.
A quick glimpse into government policies in the Indian higher education scenario after the Independence and the major changes that include autonomy and outcome based learning that evolved from these to create standards of excellence.
IPSR AcademiX Whitepaper on OBE: Designing and Implementing Outcome Based Education (OBE) for Indian HEIs
A Video Primer on the Cognitive domain of Bloom's Taxonomy, by Dr. Sunil Job. Gain a basic understanding of Bloom's scientific classification of knowledge levels.
Copyright @ 2021 ipsr solutions ltd. All rights reserved